Aren't I a Woman?

This short essay written by Sojourner Truth. She is about a former slave. Also at that moment when she is consider not a slave anymore she doesn’t waste any time to make rights for her and all the women that are not treated the way they have to be treated like. As many women at that time felt discriminated she wanted to fight for the right that white women had which were supposedly the pure one. But what I argue is what is the different about the color women than to the white . God should be in this argument because god made us all equal and nobody has the liberty to change what has already written. The following is what she argues with much detail of what she believed. This was that all women were equal and so as they were to the man. Simply it means what it is everybody is equal no matter what and no matter the color.
To begin with the first line that I found interesting was when she says that men over their says that woman need to be carried over the mud and carried on top of the carriage.

Aren't I a Woman?

This short essay written by Sojourner Truth. She is about a former slave. Also at that moment when she is consider not a slave anymore she doesn’t waste any time to make rights for her and all the women that are not treated the way they have to be treated like. As many women at that time felt discriminated she wanted to fight for the right that white women had which were supposedly the pure one. But what I argue is what is the different about the color women than to the white . God should be in this argument because god made us all equal and nobody has the liberty to change what has already written. The following is what she argues with much detail of what she believed. This was that all women were equal and so as they were to the man. Simply it means what it is everybody is equal no matter what and no matter the color.
To begin with the first line that I found interesting was when she says that men over their says that woman need to be carried over the mud and carried on top of the carriage.

THE NOTES

wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn -
www.uh.edu/engines/romanticism/introduction.html - 6k
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanticism - 104k
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realism

Questions ?

1. I think keeping in the mind of the occasion Lincoln did in fact miss something . i think it was description . Throughout the writing he states that people did this and they did that . He should have put something more specific like scholars or the actual name of this people to make it more strong.

2.that everybody should be dictated and that their dead would never be vain, what they accomplish to do here would be for the better and would never be forgotten. the sentence is very strong not only because it is the lats one but because and concludes what he has been trying to say along. The sentence brings his point to an end. The effect it may have to the people might be the since of thought they would be able to think about what they did and that it was for a good cause nothing was done in vain.

3. In my thought both of these pieces were written to freedom. both these men wanted their people not to give up and fight for what may belong to them. In a part it was to see how strong they were and to see if they handle it.the difference would be that the declaration was like a set of rules and the speech were words it was up to you to take it further.

4.Some speeches that i have heard always have a strong introduction and are very smooth. the details are presented nicely and the argument has a vivid image. they have always stated their purpose and try or keep the audience interested. Compare to Lincoln both don't really state the peoples named but rather just state "the people"