Questions ?

1. I think keeping in the mind of the occasion Lincoln did in fact miss something . i think it was description . Throughout the writing he states that people did this and they did that . He should have put something more specific like scholars or the actual name of this people to make it more strong.

2.that everybody should be dictated and that their dead would never be vain, what they accomplish to do here would be for the better and would never be forgotten. the sentence is very strong not only because it is the lats one but because and concludes what he has been trying to say along. The sentence brings his point to an end. The effect it may have to the people might be the since of thought they would be able to think about what they did and that it was for a good cause nothing was done in vain.

3. In my thought both of these pieces were written to freedom. both these men wanted their people not to give up and fight for what may belong to them. In a part it was to see how strong they were and to see if they handle it.the difference would be that the declaration was like a set of rules and the speech were words it was up to you to take it further.

4.Some speeches that i have heard always have a strong introduction and are very smooth. the details are presented nicely and the argument has a vivid image. they have always stated their purpose and try or keep the audience interested. Compare to Lincoln both don't really state the peoples named but rather just state "the people"